UL - Segall Interview
The World Fire Safety Foundation
Problems viewing this page? Click Here > > >sorry.htmlshapeimage_3_link_0
 

Vermont, USA

< < < Action Page

Visit ‘The Evidence’ pages Here > > > evidence.htmlshapeimage_5_link_0
More about UL Here > > > ulletters.htmlshapeimage_7_link_0
a) ‘UL Testing Questioned'
Has Underwriters Laboratories (UL) Committed Scientific Misconduct*?
*Scientific Misconduct:
 “The violation of the standard codes of scholarly conduct and ethical behaviour in professional scientific research.”http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_misconductshapeimage_10_link_0

The World Fire Safety Foundation
thanks WTHR’s Bob Segall for
making this video available on

HERE > > >

Drengenberg - UL: “We know if it’s a working smoke
 alarm, when the smoke hits that
 alarm, it will sound the alarm.”
John Drengenberg
Consumer Affairs Manager
Underwriters Laboratories
Bob Segall
Investigative Journalist
WTHR ‘13 Investigates’

Segall - ‘13 Investigates’: “That just doesn’t make sense . . . Is there any scientific explanation
 for why, in this real-world situation,
 we have smoke detectors not
 going off in a room full of smoke?”
Drengenberg - UL: “I really don’t know!”
“In test, after test, after test, ‘13 Investigates’ and local fire
 departments have discovered, in rooms full of heavy smoke,
 ionization smoke alarms did not activate for a long time . . . 
 So how did all the smoke alarms get one of these - a seal
 of approval from Underwriters Laboratories?”
Under Fire: UL’s ‘Seal of Approval’

Watch this film on YouTube - 7 minutes