Visit the Safety Council’s website:
New Zealand Safety Council -- ‘Smoke Alarm Report’
July 2008
The New Zealand Safety Council’s report warns of the life-threatening danger of the ionization
type of smoke alarms installed in almost all New Zealand homes.
- - - - - - - - - - More Evidence - - - - - - - - - -
- See: ‘New Zealand Fire Service - Saving Face or Saving Lives’
- See: AFAC - Official ‘Position on Smoke Alarms in Residential Accommodation’
- See: ‘Fire Protection Association Australia - Smoke Alarm Fact Sheet’
- Hear: WFSF’s New Zealand Radio Interview - ‘It’s Time to Tell The Public the Truth!’
- See: ‘Recommending Selling or Installing Ionization Smoke Alarms, A Criminal Act of Negligence?’
Supporting the banning of ionisation smoke alarms in New Zealand
Download: HERE > > >
A Special Word of Thanks . . .
The World Fire Safety Foundation thanks Mr David Calvert,
Chief Executive Officer of the New Zealand Safety Council and all NZSC members for their tireless support and commitment to the helping spread the Foundation’s message over the past six years.
“That ALL residential accommodation be fitted with PHOTOELECTRIC
smoke alarms . . . Ionization smoke alarms may not operate in time to
alert occupants early enough to escape from smouldering fires.”
The Australasian Fire & Emergency Services Authority Council’s (AFAC) official,
‘Position on Smoke Alarms in Residential Accommodation, 01 June, 2006 page 3, para 1
“. . . a consortium of Australasian fire authorities, including New Zealand, has commissioned research into smoke alarms
and the results are due to be released shortly. We will adopt the findings as soon as they are available."
Dr Paula Beever, NZFS, National Director, Fire Risk Management, in response to a radio item by the NZSC warning about ionization smoke
alarms, 09 May, 2006. From the report, ‘New Zealand Fire Service - Saving Face or Saving Lives?’ 25 May, 2006 page 6, para 8 & 9
Australasian Fire and Emergency
Service Authorities Council
09 May, 2006
01 June, 2006
“Scientific tests conducted by the Building Research Association of New Zealand were aired nationally on New
Zealand TV in May 2006 and confirmed unequivocally that ionization smoke alarms are inherently dangerous
because they do not detect smouldering fires in time for occupants to safely escape.”
Adrian Butler & Karl Westwell, WFSF Co-Founders, from the World Fire Safety Foundation’s report,
‘Recommending Selling or Installing Ionization Smoke Alarms, A Criminal Act of Negligence?’, 22 Feb, 2007, page 4, para 3
22 February, 2007
David Calvert
MNZSC ASA RSP
Send your own ‘Smoke Alarm Fraud Exposed’ letter Here > > >
iPad controls
See Positions on Smoke Alarms for Australasian Authorities Here > > >
(c) Copyright 2012 The World Fire Safety Foundation | Last Updated: 17 February, 2012 | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer | Search WFSF site
For errors on, or suggestions for this ‘nzsc’ webpage, contact the WFSF WebMaster | Supporters | About | Media