Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP
Ionization Smoke Alarms - Proposed Class Action Law Suit
The World Fire Safety Foundation
Problems viewing this page? Click  Here > > >sorry.htmlshapeimage_3_link_0
 

“This could be a major.

case that could.

make millions of.

Americans safer.”

  1. Steve Berman
    Managing Partner

Steve Berman, Managing Partner
Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro  LLP

Proposed Class Action Law Suit
Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP
27 April, 2010
“Early warning is the key to surviving smoldering fires - the deadliest kind of home
fire.  ‘Ionization-only’ smoke detectors ... are slow to warn, if they warn at all
of smoldering fires, which typically occur while the occupants are sleeping.”

Download
Here > > >

Second Amended Class Action Complaint and Jury Demand

More about the Proposed Class Action Law Suit



  1. - - - - - - - - - -  More Evidence  - - - - - - - - - -

Second Amended Class Action Complaint and Jury Demand - Introduction, page 1, para 1
Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro’s proposed Class-Action Lawsuit alleges
“prohibited practices, unfair, deceptive and unconscionable conduct”
by some of the world’s largest ionization smoke alarm manufacturers:http://www.hbsslaw.com/cases-and-investigations/smokedetectorsshapeimage_9_link_0
"Defendants’ conduct described herein constitutes prohibited practices,
unfair, deceptive and unconscionable conduct under the unfair
and deceptive trade practices acts of 32 states . . .”
Second Amended Class Action Complaint And Jury Demand 
VI. CLAIMS, Count 1, clause 85, page 34, para 1
Breaking News - Coming Soon

Could City Councils Be Held Liable When Their Fire Departments 
Provide or Promote Ionization Smoke Alarms Without Full Disclosure?
Here > > >sfc3.htmlshapeimage_17_link_0
NEW!
Photoelectric-Specific
Smoke Alarm Legislation

Scroll for all pages